Kotlin offers a powerful tool for working with large or chained data transformations: sequences. They’re similar to Java Streams and let you apply operations like map
, filter
, and takeWhile
in a lazy, step-by-step fashion. But the real question isn’t just what they are — it’s when they help, and when they actually hurt.
Let’s walk through how sequences work, when they’re useful, and when they’re not worth it.
🧠 What Is a Sequence? Link to heading
In Kotlin, a Sequence<T>
is a lazily evaluated collection — very similar to Java Streams. Unlike List.map().filter()
which applies each transformation immediately and eagerly, a Sequence
chains all transformations and only processes them when needed — and only as far as necessary.
val result = listOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
.asSequence()
.filter { it % 2 == 1 }
.map { it * 2 }
.toList() // forces evaluation
This works similarly to a pipeline — nothing happens until you collect it (toList
, first
, etc.).
🐢 Wait… Sequences Are Slower? Link to heading
Yes — for simple, in-memory transformations, sequences are often slower than doing the same thing with regular collection methods.
Why?
- Sequences introduce overhead with extra objects and indirection
- Kotlin collections are already fast and optimized for memory locality
// For small or simple operations, this is usually faster
val doubled = list.map { it * 2 }.filter { it > 10 }
So if you’re just chaining a couple of transformations on a List
of 1,000 or even 10,000 items, use regular collection ops — they’re likely faster.
✅ When to Use Sequences Link to heading
Despite the overhead, sequences shine in specific scenarios:
1. When Working with Potentially Infinite Data Link to heading
val naturals = generateSequence(1) { it + 1 }
.filter { it % 3 == 0 }
.take(10)
.toList()
Lazy evaluation makes this kind of code efficient and safe.
2. When Transformations Are Expensive or Block Link to heading
If your chain includes calls to I/O, remote services, or anything costly:
val data = ids.asSequence()
.map { fetchFromApi(it) }
.filter { it.isValid }
.take(5)
.toList()
Each transformation is only done as needed, avoiding unnecessary API calls or processing.
3. When You’re Chaining Many Steps on Large Data Link to heading
With deeply chained logic, sequences minimize intermediate allocations.
val result = list.asSequence()
.map { it.trim() }
.filter { it.isNotEmpty() }
.map { it.lowercase() }
.distinct()
.sorted()
.toList()
Especially when multiple passes over data would be expensive in memory or time.
❌ When Not to Use Sequences Link to heading
- For simple transformations over small or medium-size data
- When performance is critical and you’re not doing any expensive steps
- If you’re already working with collections and don’t need lazy behavior
In these cases, collections are faster and more readable.
🤔 So Why Bother? Link to heading
Sequences aren’t always about boosting raw performance — they’re about controlling evaluation and avoiding unnecessary work. They help when you:
- Want to stop processing early (e.g. using
take
,first
,find
) - Need to work with external, unbounded, or expensive-to-compute data
- Are operating on chains where transformation steps involve latency or I/O (like calling APIs or accessing a database)
For example, if you have a list of 1,000 IDs and only want to fetch the first 5 valid ones via an API, using a sequence means you may only make 5 or 6 network calls total. A traditional eager collection chain would likely make all 1,000 calls before filtering.
So in these cases, sequences are about speed — not in CPU cycles, but in avoiding wasteful work.
✅ Conclusion Link to heading
Kotlin Sequences are a great tool — but not a default. Use them:
- When you’re working with infinite, external, or costly data
- Not when you’re doing a few quick filters on a List of 100 items
In the right hands, they give you more control, fewer wasted cycles, and cleaner intent.
Coming next: transforming data pipelines cleanly in Kotlin using a blend of sequences, lambdas, and service boundaries.